TFNR - Particles / Vortices - Revision history

Paolo at 20:37, 24 January 2025

2025-01-24T20:37:22Z

Paolo at 15:09, 23 January 2025

2025-01-23T15:09:53Z

Paolo at 16:51, 16 December 2024

2024-12-16T16:51:16Z

Paolo at 16:42, 16 December 2024

2024-12-16T16:42:32Z

Paolo at 16:40, 16 December 2024

2024-12-16T16:40:33Z

Paolo at 16:15, 16 December 2024

2024-12-16T16:15:29Z

Show changes

Paolo at 21:02, 15 December 2024

2024-12-15T21:02:56Z

Paolo at 20:19, 13 December 2024

2024-12-13T20:19:30Z

Paolo at 20:18, 13 December 2024

2024-12-13T20:18:12Z

Paolo at 17:05, 13 December 2024

2024-12-13T17:05:23Z

@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 *total '''Charge''' (positive or negative, left-handed or right-handed chirality), relation with general cosmic chirality, superlocal or local,
 *Orientation of the '''Spin''' axis of the Structure and relation with the orientation of the Spins of the surrounding Structures, intensity and profiles of internal magnetic fields, presence and intensity of external magnetic fields, general, superlocal or local.
-In addition to these fundamental physical quantities, in the section "Complex physical quantities and phenomena" we mentioned other more complex Forces / Fields (and interactions), Weak and Strong nuclear forces and fields, derived forces and fields that are differently related to types of elementary, composite and complex particles, such as quarks, electrons, protons, neutrons, atomic nuclei, etc.) and related phenomena. I mentioned these particles in the sections "Mixed structures – Complex Particles / Vortices and Interactions" and "Properties of the Structures of Information".
+In addition to these fundamental physical quantities, in the section "Complex physical quantities and phenomena" we mentioned other more complex Forces / Fields (and interactions), Weak and Strong nuclear forces and fields, derived forces and fields that are differently related to types of elementary, composite and complex particles, such as quarks, electrons, protons, neutrons, atomic nuclei, etc.) and related phenomena. I mentioned these particles in the sections "Mixed structures - Complex Particles / Vortices and Interactions" and "Properties of the Structures of Information".

@@ Line 62: / Line 62: @@
 '''Scale of size'''
-'''As for the scale of size of the spatial extension''', we can say that Particles are '''concentrated on fairly narrow scale intervals, as well as for the Energy intervals. We can call these intervals, resonances. Given that for the same "energy environment" in which it is immersed, '''each particle will have its own fixed "rest" spatial extension''', or quasi-fixed due to the fluctuations of the Field (uncertainty).
+'''As for the scale of size of the spatial extension''', we can say that Particles are '''concentrated on fairly narrow scale intervals, as well as for the Energy intervals'''. We can call these intervals, '''resonances'''. Given that for the same "energy environment" in which it is immersed, '''each particle will have its own fixed "rest" spatial extension''', or quasi-fixed due to the fluctuations of the Field (uncertainty).
 As we have mentioned, '''the spatial dimensions of particles are variable due to various factors''', among which the most relevant ones concern '''the speed of Motion''' (for relativistic speeds their spatial dimensions also reduce considerably as they approach the upper limit of the propagation speed, just as the relativistic Mass, product of the Rest Mass by the Lorenz factor, varies, increasing as they approach the limiting speed) and '''the situation of possible compression due to specific forces or phenomena''' (e.g. compression of electrons in the innermost orbits of the atom due to electrostatic attraction.

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 We can think of turbulence in a fluid, or in a superfluid, where gradients, flows and vortices form and disappear incessantly, sometimes they are preserved and take on a recognizable shape that can be associated precisely with that of a bubble, a three-dimensional vortex, which for a certain time resists the transformative forces, in the continuous push and pull between constructive and destructive, structuring and destructuring, organizational and disorganizational processes, organization balanced between chaos and order.
-Comparing what we are saying about particles with what we have said about Dark Matter Halos / Dark Energy, the identities, similarities, symmetries are evident. '''In many respects the only difference concerns the scale of size, immense for Dark Structures, microscopic for Ordinary Structures''', which we call Ordinary Matter Particles. It is clear that '''we are repeating what was said in the section on Dark Halos, adapting it to the peculiar nature, shape, characteristics, properties, behaviors, dynamics, etc. of Particles'''.
+Comparing what we are saying about particles with what we have said about Dark Matter / Dark Energy Halos, the identities, similarities, symmetries are evident. '''In many respects the only difference concerns the scale of size, immense for Dark Structures, microscopic for Ordinary Structures''', which we call Ordinary Matter Particles. It is clear that '''we are repeating what was said in the section on Dark Halos, adapting it to the peculiar nature, shape, characteristics, properties, behaviors, dynamics, etc. of Particles'''.
 But how do these distribution profiles of the Elementary Action in its different Components present themselves? As we have said, '''the general shape of a Dark Halo can ideally be thought of as spherical'''. But precisely because these are shapes that emerge from turbulence, immersed in turbulence, that feed on turbulence, so to speak, '''the real shapes can also be very far from the ideal ones, which still remain a sort of chaotic attractors of shape'''.

@@ Line 114: / Line 114: @@
 Even for Particles, even for the elementary ones that are not composed, not made up of components, of parts, '''we can hypothesize the existence of internal, as well as external, dynamics''' (interactions with the environment, that is with the Elementary Field and its spontaneous dynamics, and with other Dark and Ordinary Structures). Regarding internal dynamics, in addition to the theme of natural turbulence, we reiterate that Vortices / Particles, even the elementary ones, are not immaterial points, nor monolithic and homogeneous marbles, nor immaterial and abstract clouds of probability, nor mere solutions of equations. They are real objects, "Structures", with '''a non-uniform spatial distribution of the correlations of the Components of the Elementary Action''', which describe the Modes in which the spatial fluctuations (Elementary Events) of the Field manifest themselves and produce the stochastic / deterministic processes that we observe as Particles, with their physical quantities that represent average values in Space and Time.
-'''And so the interactions'''. Relations between such distributions, between forms that approach, sometimes repel, sometimes attract and interpenetrate, processes of processes, turbulence that reorganizes itself on infinitesimal distances in ultra-rapid times, following rigorous vector laws, and in forms, Information, which incessantly emerges and re-emerges from this turbulence, floats on it so to speak, like the white foam rides the waves of the turbulent and dark ocean. '''Will we ever be able to express these poetic images in equations, their meaning for the description of Reality, of Particles and their interactions?''' In some sense, conventional physics is already doing it.. but reading those equations we struggle to see and understand the wave, the ocean, the foam, the wind, the coast, and everything that true Reality is made of. And so, from those equations we imagine, hypothesize, fantasize, and we are not always able to grasp "Reality in its reality".
+'''And so their interactions'''. Relations between such distributions, between forms that approach, sometimes repel, sometimes attract and interpenetrate, processes of processes, turbulence that reorganizes itself on infinitesimal distances in ultra-rapid times, following rigorous vector laws, and in forms, Information, which incessantly emerges and re-emerges from this turbulence, floats on it so to speak, like the white foam rides the waves of the turbulent and dark ocean. '''Will we ever be able to express these poetic images in equations, their meaning for the description of Reality, of Particles and their interactions?''' In some sense, conventional physics is already doing it.. but reading those equations we struggle to see and understand the wave, the ocean, the foam, the wind, the coast, and everything that true Reality is made of. And so, from those equations we imagine, hypothesize, fantasize, and we are not always able to grasp "Reality in its reality".
 '''Internal dynamics...''' we have already mentioned the most relevant and surprising aspect, the '''superposition of quantum states. Let's take the image of the Spin of an electron again'''. Intrinsic angular momentum. Intrinsic means that the Spin does not derive from the rotation of the electron. It is something that comes from the inside, that happens inside, that depends on the very nature of the electron, on its shape, on the organization of the processes that make its existence possible. Each event point of the region of the Elementary Field that from time to time supports the electron, each event point animated by the natural spontaneous turbulence of the Field, at that precise moment superimposes on the turbulence the correlation of the temporal distribution of the spatial fluctuations that replace the Elementary Events. '''Each point is Perturbation, Translation and Rotation, Chirality and Orientation of the Axis of Rotation / Chirality'''. Each point, in the correlation with the other points of the aforementioned region of the Field, '''each point, as part of a Vortex-type Structure, is a source of Spin''', and the correlation of this dynamic characteristic on all the points that support the electron represents its Spin as a unitary, individual Particle.

@@ Line 118: / Line 118: @@
 '''Internal dynamics...''' we have already mentioned the most relevant and surprising aspect, the '''superposition of quantum states. Let's take the image of the Spin of an electron again'''. Intrinsic angular momentum. Intrinsic means that the Spin does not derive from the rotation of the electron. It is something that comes from the inside, that happens inside, that depends on the very nature of the electron, on its shape, on the organization of the processes that make its existence possible. Each event point of the region of the Elementary Field that from time to time supports the electron, each event point animated by the natural spontaneous turbulence of the Field, at that precise moment superimposes on the turbulence the correlation of the temporal distribution of the spatial fluctuations that replace the Elementary Events. '''Each point is Perturbation, Translation and Rotation, Chirality and Orientation of the Axis of Rotation / Chirality'''. Each point, in the correlation with the other points of the aforementioned region of the Field, '''each point, as part of a Vortex-type Structure, is a source of Spin''', and the correlation of this dynamic characteristic on all the points that support the electron represents its Spin as a unitary, individual Particle.
-But, '''this correlation is never expressed at its maximum potential''' (the axis of Rotation / Chirality of all the event points oriented in the same precise direction). Each point has its chaotic component and the perfect unidirectional orientation would require a very large, almost infinite energy to be realized and maintained. '''The equilibrium conditions of the existence of the Particle in the Field, for the electron, provide a specific "rest" value'''. Around that specific intensity of correlation (which expresses the intrinsic angular momentum in the spatial directions considered) the effective value is distributed (remember the stochastic / deterministic process theme that we can use to describe the dynamics of the Particle, the electron in this case).
+But, '''this correlation is never expressed at its maximum potential''' (the axis of Rotation / Chirality of all the event points oriented in the same precise direction). Each point has its chaotic component and the perfect unidirectional orientation would require a very large, almost infinite energy to be realized and maintained. '''The equilibrium conditions of the existence of the Particle in the Field, for the electron, provide a specific "rest" value'''. Around that specific intensity of correlation (which expresses the intrinsic angular momentum in the spatial directions considered) is distributed the effective value (remember the stochastic / deterministic process theme that we can use to describe the dynamics of the Particle, the electron in this case).
 In this turbulent context on which the Information that gives shape to the Structure under examination is superimposed, everything is in continuous fluctuation around punctual and global values of this type of Vortex / Particle. While the global values are substantially constant and stable (within the limits of indeterminacy, obviously), '''the punctual values can be very variable, determining an internal dynamic that is also very intense and rapid'''. Dynamics of the individual points and their correlations can spontaneously organize themselves in local "resonances" of portions of the Particle. To use the language of conventional physics in terms of quantum mechanics, it is as if partial entanglements, of portions, of sets of event points spontaneously formed and evolved under entanglement within the Particle, almost as if, while respecting the overall shape of the electron, different portions of it lived a life of their own and produced physical quantities (the orientation of the Spin axis in this case) of different values, in incessant evolution, and interaction between them.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:02, 15 December 2024
Line 111:		Line 111:

	These Processes can and must be described and modeled through stochastic / deterministic processes, and processes of processes, which in their intertwining and relationship, design the evolution of the structures of Reality. The stochastic part of these processes probabilistically describes this seething of randomness, turbulence and indeterminacy, while the part that we call deterministic, perhaps improperly, but I can't think of a better term, describes the existing Information that tends to be preserved, even through transformations, which are precisely one of the fundamental aspects of dynamics.		These Processes can and must be described and modeled through stochastic / deterministic processes, and processes of processes, which in their intertwining and relationship, design the evolution of the structures of Reality. The stochastic part of these processes probabilistically describes this seething of randomness, turbulence and indeterminacy, while the part that we call deterministic, perhaps improperly, but I can't think of a better term, describes the existing Information that tends to be preserved, even through transformations, which are precisely one of the fundamental aspects of dynamics.
		+
		+	Even for Particles, even for the elementary ones that are not composed, are not made up of components, of parts, we can hypothesize the existence of internal dynamics, as well as external ones (interactions with the environment, that is with the Elementary Field and its spontaneous dynamics, and with other Dark and Ordinary Structures). Regarding internal dynamics, in addition to the theme of natural turbulence, we reiterate that Vortices, even the elementary ones, are not immaterial points, nor monolithic and homogeneous marbles, nor immaterial and abstract clouds of probability, nor mere solutions of equations. They are real objects, "Structures", with a non-uniform spatial distribution of the correlations of the Components of the Elementary Action, which describe the Modes in which the spatial fluctuations (Elementary Events) of the Field manifest themselves and produce the stochastic / deterministic processes that we observe as Particles, with their physical quantities that represent average values in Space and Time.
		+
		+	And so the interactions. Relations between such distributions, between forms that approach, sometimes repel, sometimes attract and interpenetrate, processes of processes, turbulence that reorganizes itself on infinitesimal distances in ultra-rapid times, following rigorous vector laws, and in forms, Information, which incessantly emerges and re-emerges from this turbulence, floats on it so to speak, like the white foam rides the waves of the turbulent and dark ocean. Will we ever be able to express these poetic images in equations, their meaning for the description of Reality, of Particles and their interactions? In some sense, conventional physics is already doing it.. but reading those equations we struggle to see and understand the wave, the ocean, the foam, the wind, the coast, and everything that true Reality is made of. And so, from those equations we imagine, hypothesize, fantasize, and we are not always able to grasp "Reality in its reality".
		+
		+	Internal dynamics... we have already mentioned the most relevant and surprising aspect, the superposition of quantum states. Let's take the image of the Spin of an electron again. Intrinsic angular momentum. Intrinsic means that the Spin does not derive from the rotation of the electron. It is something that comes from the inside, that happens inside, that depends on the very nature of the electron, on its shape, on the organization of the processes that make its existence possible. Each event point of the region of the Elementary Field that from time to time supports the electron, each event point animated by the natural spontaneous turbulence of the Field, at that precise moment superimposes on the turbulence the correlation of the temporal distribution of the spatial fluctuations that replace the Elementary Events. Each point is Perturbation, Translation and Rotation, Chirality and Orientation of the Axis of Rotation / Chirality. Each point, in the correlation with the other points of the aforementioned region of the Field, each point is a source of Spin, and the correlation of this dynamic characteristic on all the points that support the electron represents the Spin of the electron as a unitary, individual Particle.
		+
		+	But, this correlation is never expressed at its maximum potential (the axis of Rotation / Chirality of all the event points oriented in the same precise direction). Each point has its chaotic component and the perfect unidirectional orientation would require a very large, almost infinite energy to be realized and maintained. The equilibrium conditions of the existence of the Particle in the Field, for the electron, provide a specific "rest" value. Around that specific correlation value (which expresses the intrinsic angular momentum in the spatial directions considered) the effective value is distributed (remember the stochastic / deterministic process theme that we can use to describe the dynamics of the Particle, the electron in this case).
		+
		+	In this turbulent context on which the Information that gives shape to the Structure under examination is superimposed, everything is in continuous fluctuation around punctual and global values of this type of Vortex / Particle. While the global values are substantially constant and stable (within the limits of indeterminacy, obviously), the punctual values can be very variable, determining an internal dynamic that is also very intense and rapid. Dynamics of the individual points and their correlations that can spontaneously organize themselves in local "resonances" of portions of the Particle. To use the language of conventional physics in terms of quantum mechanics, it is as if partial entanglements, of portions, of sets of event points spontaneously formed and evolved under entanglement within the Particle, almost as if, while respecting the overall shape of the electron, different portions of it lived a life of their own and produced physical quantities (the orientation of the Spin axis in this case) of different values, in incessant evolution, and interaction between them. Here, what we are hypothesizing about the internal dynamics of Particles corresponds to various "abstract" expressions that we find in Quantum mechanics and honestly I struggle to understand:
		+	*presence of quantum turbulence / virtual particles that produce various effects (masking of the charge, etc.)
		+	*when it is said that a Particle interacts with itself
		+	*when it is said that a Particle at a given instant is in a superposition of different quantum states (e.g. spin up and spin down)
		+	*when it is said that the superposition of quantum states of a Particle due to a measurement (an interaction) "collapses" to a "defined" quantum state
		+	Rewritten on the basis of the hypotheses that we have expressed here, it should sound more or less like this:
		+	*presence of quantum turbulence / virtual particles that produce various effects (masking of the charge, etc.) -> the life of a particle is suspended between chaos and order, its shape and its dynamics are organized around a chaotic attractor that is conserved to the extent that the "conditions of equilibrium" or "existence conditions" are respected (compatibility with the dynamics of the Field and the environment in which the Particle is immersed)
		+	*when it is said that a Particle interacts with itself -> different portions of the Particle manifest different correlations, and in continuous evolution also influenced by the outside, in one or more Components of the Elementary Action, and therefore different fundamental physical quantities; until we take a snapshot everything is in constant evolution and we cannot know if at a given instant the global result, for the particle as a whole, of these partially independent evolutions will be spin up or spin down; the snapshot by its nature will produce the alignment of all partial processes; after taking the snapshot, the evolution of the partial processes will continue from a state of alignment towards a progressive divergence and an ever greater independence of the partial processes due to the turbulence of the Field, the interactions with the outside that can affect the Particle from different directions with different influence on the various portions of the same)
		+	*when we say that a Particle at a given instant is in a superposition of different quantum states (e.g. spin up and spin down) -> the processes of the internal dynamics of a Particle can express different levels of uniformity / non-uniformity, correlation / independence, etc.; if at a given instant, different portions of the same Particle are evolving in a non-uniform or not completely uniform way, this can be represented as a superposition of quantum states; the same particle, but different portions with different spin orientations at the same time
		+	*when we say that the superposition of quantum states of a Particle as a result of a measurement (an interaction) "collapses" to a "defined" quantum state -> when we make a measurement, when we take a snapshot of the Particle, it is as if we were going to ask each event point to pose for the photo; if its orientation is even just a billionth of a degree "up", we ask it to turn completely in the "up" direction, vice versa for the "down". In this way, instantly when the flash flashes, the situation is clearly and unmistakably defined. The photo is precise and defined, "not blurred" or indefinite. But from the instant immediately following the shot, each point starts to go partially on its way again, to fluctuate around a value, a spatial orientation quite compliant with that necessary to maintain the general shape of the Particle, the famous "equilibrium conditions", the "chaotic attractor", etc.
		+
		+	In this sense, we can see the Particles as dynamic systems (linear and non-linear) in incessant internal and external evolution, with "quasi-conservation" of the shape and of the peculiar physical quantities, in continuous interaction with the Elementary Field and the other InfoStructures present in it. The external dynamics influences the internal dynamics. And the internal dynamics influences the way in which the Particle reacts to the external dynamics.
		+
		+	Regarding external dynamics, given the vast production of studies and research that characterize particle physics, I would not like to add anything here to what has already been expressed in many parts of this chapter, as well as in the second chapter. In this context, the phenomenon that I consider most significant and important for understanding the nature, properties, form and dynamics of Particles is quantum entanglement. After what has been expressed regarding internal dynamics, this topic takes on a different and, in my opinion, clearer light, in light of the hypotheses formulated in this work of mine. Entanglement (correlation of quantum states) between particles (let's call it external entanglement) takes on a clearer meaning if considered from the point of view of internal entanglement (structure of correlations between the dynamics, partially non-homogeneous, of the different portions of event points that support the Particle), as briefly described above.

@@ Line 108: / Line 108: @@
 A step further. I believe that not only is it not possible to know at the same time with infinite precision the value of two conjugated variables (e.g. position and moment), but that it is not possible to know perfectly the instantaneous value of any variable. And this in relation both to the natural spontaneous turbulence that animates the Elementary Field and constitutes the source of Existence and the "raw material" of all that exists, and to the fundamental nature of Time. We have spoken about this on numerous occasions in this work.
-In the midst of this generative chaos, this omnipresent turbulence, the emerging organization of correlations (Relations) between Processes of Events constitutes Information / Energy that is organized into Information Structures, which represent the bricks with which Forms and the Universe are incessantly built. Information that tends to be conserved, that evolves for conservation, for a causal and variational permanence that allows the incessant evolution of Reality towards ever new and greater levels of complexity.
+In the middle of this generative chaos, this omnipresent turbulence, the emerging organization of correlations (Relations) between Processes of Events constitutes Information / Energy that is organized into Information Structures, which represent the bricks with which Forms and the Universe are incessantly built. Information that tends to be conserved, that evolves for conservation, for a causal and variational permanence that allows the incessant evolution of Reality towards ever new and greater levels of complexity.
 These Processes can and must be described and modeled through stochastic / deterministic processes, and processes of processes, which in their intertwining and relationship, design the evolution of the structures of Reality. The stochastic part of these processes probabilistically describes this seething of randomness, turbulence and indeterminacy, while the part that we call deterministic, perhaps improperly, but I can't think of a better term, describes the existing Information that tends to be preserved, even through transformations, which are precisely one of the fundamental aspects of dynamics.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:18, 13 December 2024
Line 98:		Line 98:

	'''Their extremely modest spatial extension and the dynamics expressed on very small time scales, '''significantly limit the possibility of direct observation. To discover the properties and behaviors of Particles, especially composite ones, it is necessary to use very complex methodologies, and often sophisticated and expensive instrumentation.		'''Their extremely modest spatial extension and the dynamics expressed on very small time scales, '''significantly limit the possibility of direct observation. To discover the properties and behaviors of Particles, especially composite ones, it is necessary to use very complex methodologies, and often sophisticated and expensive instrumentation.
		+
		+
		+	'''Dynamics'''
		+
		+	While for the Dark Halos, since they are objects not sufficiently understood and described by conventional science, we have tried to outline the most relevant aspects of internal and external dynamics, for the Particles, given the immense progress of modern particle physics, I will limit myself to pointing out some aspects that I consider of primary importance. In the next sections of this chapter, I will try to outline some models of these Structures, of the phenomena in which they are protagonists and of the dynamics that manifest themselves.
		+
		+	Let us reiterate once again that chaos, turbulence and uncertainty are at the basis of Physical Reality, and therefore also the Particles by their nature, formation and dynamics share these aspects and are in some way influenced by them. No form, no physical quantity of the Particles can be considered perfectly certain and immutable. Uncertainty, as highlighted by the Principle of the same name, is ontological, not epistemological
		+
		+	A step further. I believe that not only is it not possible to know at the same time with infinite precision the value of two conjugated variables (e.g. position and moment), but that it is not possible to know perfectly the instantaneous value of any variable. And this in relation both to the natural spontaneous turbulence that animates the Elementary Field and constitutes the source of Existence and the "raw material" of all that exists, and to the fundamental nature of Time. We have spoken about this on numerous occasions in this work.
		+
		+	In the midst of this generative chaos, this omnipresent turbulence, the emerging organization of correlations (Relations) between Processes of Events constitutes Information / Energy that is organized into Information Structures, which represent the bricks with which Forms and the Universe are incessantly built. Information that tends to be conserved, that evolves for conservation, for a causal and variational permanence that allows the incessant evolution of Reality towards ever new and greater levels of complexity.
		+
		+	These Processes can and must be described and modeled through stochastic / deterministic processes, and processes of processes, which in their intertwining and relationship, design the evolution of the structures of Reality. The stochastic part of these processes probabilistically describes this seething of randomness, turbulence and indeterminacy, while the part that we call deterministic, perhaps improperly, but I can't think of a better term, describes the existing Information that tends to be preserved, even through transformations, which are precisely one of the fundamental aspects of dynamics.

@@ Line 77: / Line 77: @@
 '''Detection'''
-Unlike what we said about the Vortices / Dark Halos, where all the attempts at detection have so far proved fruitless, except obviously for the indirect observations through the gravitational effects produced on Ordinary Matter (visible) and more generally on the organization of the cosmic structure, in the case of Particles the collection of data on their nature, structure and dynamics are infinite. We can say that a large part of the investments of economic and human resources in basic scientific research have gone and continue to go in the broad field of particle physics. Very expensive colliders that centralize countless experiments, thousands of researchers involved and distributed across the planet, immense theoretical efforts, etc.
+Unlike what we said about the Vortices / Dark Halos, where all the attempts at detection have so far proved fruitless, except obviously for the indirect observations through the gravitational effects produced on Ordinary Matter (visible) and more generally on the organization of the cosmic structure, in the case of Particles '''the collection of data on their nature, structure and dynamics are infinite'''. We can say that a large part of the investments of economic and human resources in basic scientific research have gone and continue to go in the broad field of particle physics. Very expensive colliders that centralize countless experiments, thousands of researchers involved and distributed across the planet, immense theoretical efforts, etc.
-The products of all this tireless activity are set like precious gems in the most consolidated models and theories, Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Field Theory, Standard Model of Particles. Honor to all the researchers who in various ways have been part of this titanic work.
+'''The products of all this tireless activity are set like precious gems in the most consolidated models and theories''', Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Field Theory, Standard Model of Particles. Honor to all the researchers who in various ways have been part of this titanic work.
-"Nevertheless"... yes, many of us say "nevertheless"... Nevertheless, despite everything, some, perhaps many, pieces of the puzzle do not seem to fit together properly. Sometimes I think that, as with cosmology, the situation is even worse. That there is a fundamental error in the way we observe Nature at small scales, that we are missing something fundamental, to reach a unitary, profound and, at the same time, general vision of Energy and Matter. Sometimes it seems to me that those models and theories so laboriously developed by generations of scientists, which in some respects allow us to predict with such accuracy what happens in our laboratories, are as if they were interposing themselves between us and further possible, desirable, advances. As if they allowed us to measure, observe, predict, but made our life particularly difficult when we try to describe, interpret, imagine, visualize.
+'''"Nevertheless"... yes, many of us say "nevertheless"...''' Nevertheless, despite everything, '''some, perhaps many, pieces of the puzzle do not seem to fit together properly'''. Sometimes I think that, as with cosmology, the situation is even worse. That there is a fundamental error in the way we observe Nature at small scales, that we are missing something fundamental, to reach a unitary, profound and, at the same time, general vision of Energy and Matter. Sometimes it seems to me that those models and theories so laboriously developed by generations of scientists, which in some respects allow us to predict with such accuracy what happens in our laboratories, are '''as if they were interposing themselves between us and further possible, desirable, advances'''. As if they allowed us to measure, observe, predict, but made our life particularly difficult when we try to describe, interpret, imagine, visualize.
-I think this depends on various factors, which I have tried to highlight in various parts of this work. Here, one aspect in particular comes to mind. I believe that one of the problems that make life most difficult is a tendency to extrapolate models, explanations, mathematics, from their ontological and phenomenal context and extend them to all Physical Reality, as dogmas, absolute truths, which although nominally considered hypotheses, repeated endlessly, like a sacred mantra, have become so rooted in the subconscious of the community of researchers that it influences and directs everything, in a subtle and unfortunately uncritical way.
+'''I think this depends on various factors''', which I have tried to highlight in various parts of this work. Here, one aspect in particular comes to mind. I believe that one of the problems that make life most difficult is '''a tendency to extrapolate models, explanations, mathematics, from their ontological and phenomenal context and extend them to all Physical Reality, as dogmas, absolute truths''', which although nominally considered hypotheses, repeated endlessly, like a sacred mantra, have become so rooted in the subconscious of the community of researchers that it influences and directs everything, in a subtle and unfortunately uncritical way.
-An example. We saw the first one in a recent section, talking about photons and electromagnetic waves. Given that Waves and Vortices in the model I propose here, despite having different shapes and dynamics, share the same nature and rootedness in the Dynamics of Elementary Action, as seen, the theme of the wave / particle duality regarding photons / electromagnetic waves, the difficulty of reconciling such different, opposite properties and dynamics, in phenomena that should concern the same type of physical entities, in my opinion comes precisely from the tendency to extend what seem to be universal insights and instead are not the only ones.
+'''An example.''' We saw the first one in a recent section, talking about photons and electromagnetic waves. Given that Waves and Vortices in the model I propose here, despite having different shapes and dynamics, share the same nature and rootedness in the Dynamics of Elementary Action, as seen, '''the theme of the wave / particle duality regarding photons / electromagnetic waves''', the difficulty of reconciling such different, opposite properties and dynamics, in phenomena that should concern the same type of physical entities, '''in my opinion comes precisely from the tendency to extend what seem to be universal insights and instead are not the only ones'''.
-There is no doubt that radio waves are Waves, electromagnetic waves, where one cycle follows the other in a coherent and synchronized way. And normally each cycle has the same wavelength and perhaps the same polarization, intensity, energy, etc. And why should we ever think that light is made up of the same types of waves, with the same origin, the same shape, etc. It is not enough that both types of phenomena (emission of a radio wave by a conductor, an antenna, powered by an alternating current produced by a special generator, the transmitter) can be classified under the same theories (electromagnetism and then quantum electrodynamics).
+'''There is no doubt that radio waves are Waves''', electromagnetic waves, where one cycle follows the other in a coherent and synchronized way. And normally each cycle has the same wavelength and perhaps the same polarization, intensity, energy, etc. '''And why should we ever think that light is made up of the same types of waves''', with the same origin, the same shape, etc. It is not enough that both types of phenomena (emission of a radio wave by a conductor, an antenna, powered by an alternating current produced by a special generator, the transmitter) can be classified under the same theories (electromagnetism and then quantum electrodynamics).
-Do we perhaps think that an electron bouncing in an atom is an antenna, a metal conductor carrying an electric current? Let's say that Quantum Mechanics has not helped, in this sense. All wave mechanics, in my opinion, has provided an interesting predictive model, etc., but has introduced a great ontological and phenomenological confusion in the already confused panorama. It has provided a misleading interpretation, inducing a misunderstanding of the true nature of the wave function. The wave function is a mathematical construction in the space of quantum states. It is not the description of a wave in Physical Reality. Therefore, most of the illustrations found in many articles, books, videos, etc. are completely wrong, and even worse, misleading, dangerous, and denote a poor understanding of what we are talking about. I am a bit drastic, but it is incredible how much nonsense is found in the furrow of science. Endless repetitions of the same nonsense, seasoned in a thousand different ways. Fortunately, there are first-rate researchers and popularizers who raise a level that would otherwise be terrible.
+'''Do we perhaps think that an electron bouncing in an atom is an antenna, a metal conductor carrying an electric current?''' Let's say that '''Quantum Mechanics has not helped, in this sense'''. All wave mechanics, in my opinion, has provided an interesting predictive model, etc., but has introduced a great ontological and phenomenological confusion in an already confused panorama. '''It has provided a misleading interpretation, inducing a misunderstanding of the true nature of the wave function'''. The wave function is a mathematical construction in the space of quantum states. It is not the description of a wave in Physical Reality. Therefore, most of the illustrations found in many articles, books, videos, etc. are completely wrong, and even worse, misleading, dangerous, and denote a poor understanding of what we are talking about. '''I am a bit drastic, but it is incredible how much nonsense is found in the field of science'''. Endless repetitions of the same nonsense, seasoned in a thousand different ways. Fortunately, there are first-rate researchers and popularizers who raise a level that would otherwise be a little low.
-So, returning to photons and electromagnetic waves, as illustrated in the dedicated sections, a photon is an InfoStructure of the "Wave" type, "Single-Cycle" subtype, which due to its localizability, finite spatial extension, and other important characteristics, can sometimes appear in observations as a Particle (but in fact it is not a Vortex / Particle). It is emitted by an electron that decelerates while returning to a position of the free atomic cloud, corresponding to the state of lowest energy. While an electromagnetic wave, for example a radio wave emitted by an antenna powered by a transmitter, is an InfoStructure of the "Wave" type, "Multi-cycle" subtype, which due to its poor localizability, virtually infinite spatial extension, and other important characteristics, in observations appears precisely as a wave. I will not go into further detail as the comparison seems absolutely clear to me.
+So, '''returning to photons and electromagnetic waves''' of this example, as illustrated in the dedicated sections, '''a photon''' is an InfoStructure of the "Wave" type, "Single-Cycle" subtype, which due to its localizability, finite spatial extension, and other important characteristics, can sometimes appear in observations as a Particle (but in fact it is not a Vortex / Particle). It is emitted by an electron that decelerates while returning to a position of the free atomic cloud, corresponding to the state of lowest energy. While '''an electromagnetic wave''', for example a radio wave emitted by an antenna powered by a transmitter, is an InfoStructure of the "Wave" type, "Multi-cycle" subtype, which due to its poor localizability, virtually infinite spatial extension, and other important characteristics, in observations appears precisely as a wave.
 '''Returning to the detectability of the InfoStructures of Ordinary Matter''', ideally it seems possible to make observations and measurements in all the Components of the Action and that through their correlations and combinations produce the fundamental physical quantities and the related phenomena. Only for the Mass and gravitational phenomena, the detection of a single Particle, which has a very small Mass (e.g. electron), is extremely difficult. It is much easier to make measurements of the quantities related to the Motion, or of the Charge and Spin. The use of electromagnetic phenomena, in particular, provides both tools to manipulate the Particles (e.g. lasers, radio waves, etc.) and to detect them (various emissions).
-Their extremely modest spatial extension and the dynamics expressed on very small time scales, '''significantly limit the possibility of direct observation. To discover the properties and behaviors of Particles, especially composite ones, it is necessary to use very complex methodologies, and often sophisticated and expensive instrumentation.
+'''Their extremely modest spatial extension and the dynamics expressed on very small time scales, '''significantly limit the possibility of direct observation. To discover the properties and behaviors of Particles, especially composite ones, it is necessary to use very complex methodologies, and often sophisticated and expensive instrumentation.
 {{Template:PaperPages1}}