Paper Lab - Revision history

Paolo: /* Paper Symbols */

2026-07-13T13:49:48Z

‎Paper Symbols

2026-07-13T13:49:33Z

2026-03-24T16:21:33Z

‎Terms

2026-01-18T15:32:59Z

‎Tips

2026-01-18T15:32:31Z

‎Tips

2025-12-24T09:24:43Z

‎Terms

2025-12-22T15:23:36Z

‎Terms

2025-12-22T15:23:11Z

‎Terms

2025-07-16T13:40:55Z

2025-07-16T13:40:31Z

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 == Paper Symbols ==
-Page that contains alla the formal symbols used in the paper:[[Paper Symbol]]
+Page that contains alla the formal symbols used in the paper: [[Paper Symbols]]
 == More topics ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:49, 13 July 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:

	The main purpose of this project laboratory is the realization of a first introductory paper on that part of [[Evolutionary Knowledge]] that we call [[Evolutionary Physics]]. The title of this paper is "'''The Fundamental Nature of Reality - An Introduction to Evolutionary Physics'''", or, in short, "'''TFNR'''".		The main purpose of this project laboratory is the realization of a first introductory paper on that part of [[Evolutionary Knowledge]] that we call [[Evolutionary Physics]]. The title of this paper is "'''The Fundamental Nature of Reality - An Introduction to Evolutionary Physics'''", or, in short, "'''TFNR'''".
		+
		+	== Paper Symbols ==
		+
		+	Page that contains alla the formal symbols used in the paper:[[Paper Symbol]]

	== More topics ==		== More topics ==

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 == Terms ==
-'''Event-point(s)'''
+'''Event-point(s)''' -> EP
 Point-event, points-event, point-events, event-point, event point -> chosen form: event-point

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 µ -> $\mu$
-<!--no latex-->      <!--/no latex-->
+no latex  <!--no latex-->      <!--/no latex-->
-<!--latex:      -->
+latex     <!--latex:      -->
 == Terms ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:24, 24 December 2025
Line 43:		Line 43:

	*event‑point (with hyphen) - More marked and definitional - Signals a unified technical concept - Useful		*event‑point (with hyphen) - More marked and definitional - Signals a unified technical concept - Useful
		+
		+
		+	'''Temporal prevalence'''
		+
		+	Temporal prevalence in the distributions of elementary spatial fluctuation, of Elementary Events.
		+

	'''"Space-time" and "Spacetime" or "spacetime"'''		'''"Space-time" and "Spacetime" or "spacetime"'''

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:23, 22 December 2025
Line 43:		Line 43:

	*event‑point (with hyphen) - More marked and definitional - Signals a unified technical concept - Useful		*event‑point (with hyphen) - More marked and definitional - Signals a unified technical concept - Useful
−

	'''"Space-time" and "Spacetime" or "spacetime"'''		'''"Space-time" and "Spacetime" or "spacetime"'''

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:23, 22 December 2025
Line 23:		Line 23:

	== Terms ==		== Terms ==
		+
		+	'''Event-point(s)'''
		+
		+	Point-event, points-event, point-events, event-point, event point -> chosen form: event-point
		+
		+	Preferred term: event-points: This is the standard and most natural English ordering. It mirrors established constructions like event horizon, event space, space‑time point, etc.
		+
		+	Event-points works better because:
		+	*It places the category ("points") last, which is typical in English noun phrases.
		+	*It reads as "points of an event‑structure," which aligns with your conceptual use.
		+	*It avoids the slightly awkward inversion of point events, which could be misread as "events that are pointlike."
		+
		+	When point events might be used:
		+	*Only if you want to emphasize events that are pointlike (i.e., events treated as points).
		+	*But in your framework, you’re doing the opposite: you're stressing that they are not truly pointlike, but infinitesimal domains.
		+
		+	Hyphen or not?
		+	*event point (without hyphen) - More common in contemporary English - Sounds more neutral and fluid - Matches expressions like phase space, field point, spacetime point - Suggests "event" is just a descriptive modifier
		+
		+	*event‑point (with hyphen) - More marked and definitional - Signals a unified technical concept - Useful
		+

	'''"Space-time" and "Spacetime" or "spacetime"'''		'''"Space-time" and "Spacetime" or "spacetime"'''

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:40, 16 July 2025
Line 33:		Line 33:

	So if you're writing in a scientific or academic tone—especially in physics—"spacetime" is the way to go.		So if you're writing in a scientific or academic tone—especially in physics—"spacetime" is the way to go.
−
−

	== Chapters ==		== Chapters ==